June 19th 13, 04:04 AM
posted to sci.space.history
|
|
Hear No Evil, See No Evil / Brad Guth
On Saturday, June 8, 2013 7:07:08 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Speaking of "Hear No Evil, See No Evil"
Where's our operation PRISM when we need them?
The Bilderbergs and Rothschilds are having yet another one of their
cozy and very private get-togethers, along with another hundred some
odd billionaires making a combined group cabal wealth of perhaps a
hundred trillion worth of mostly extorted loot from the rest of us.
http://news.yahoo.com/club-rich-powe...ar-london-1014...
What could possibly be going on, other than plotting continued
oligarch skulduggery behind those closed doors?
Even of this group, I doubt more than 10% of them have any real upper
caste authority to actually do anything as truly secret and
independent of government regulations and authority, but that's still
a dozen that get to do everything exactly as they please, regardless
of whomever we elect or appoint.
On Jun 3, 12:02*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
It’s the job of a few to make these public Usenet/newsgroups as K-12
unfriendly and/or media undesirable as well as generally as raunchy X-
rated as possible. *These individuals are actually one and the same
bully-naysayers and FUD-masters that systematically topic/author stalk
and trash upon anyone with an original idea or discovery of any
significance or potential of significance, because it seems they want
not an independent soul and/or private author or researcher to ever
get mainstream attention or otherwise noticed by others, much less
receiving any official public support.
Of course, for the past 12+ years I’ve been telling of this
interpretation of our public Usenet/newsgroup media being
systematically trashed because, it seems this public Usenet community
that’s merged along with Google Groups and Groups+ has simply become
too easily accessible by K12s and others, that nowadays via social
networking could possibly take notice of our topics and replies on
subjects of science, physics, politics, social networking and general
newsworthy issues, and it seems the oligarchs in charge of whatever we
get to read and interpret as truly independent of whatever these
oligarchs desire, is an obvious status quo damage-control situation
that can’t be let to evolve or flourish on its own, much less given
any direct benefits that would become K-12 and higher educated
attracting to those looking for the best available science and the
most independent interpretations of newsworthy topics, because these
oligarchs in charge of our government and the mainstream media
(including moderated reference material and public school textbooks)
are clearly so very much afraid of what we independent outsiders might
have to say.
Newsgroup "alt.astronomy" seems to be a Usenet Mecca of what the
mainstream status-quo of their oligarch holy grail matrix thinks is
utmost imperative to topic/author stalk and bash for all they can
muster.
*http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...y/topics?hl=en
*For example, the mainstream of physics and science wants to exclude,
banish and/or obfuscate as to allowing any possibility of captured
moons, planetoids or planets, even though the merging of entire
galaxies is commonplace and otherwise perfectly obvious. *Apparently
those laws of physics are conditional, and all public derived science
has to be mainstream moderated by the oligarchs before any of it
becomes viable, and the same status-quo gauntlet of applied
obfuscation(evidence excluding), nay-say and nondisclosure applies for
any potential exploitation of anything involving our moon or Venus.
Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software,
as to viewing this one small but rather interesting mountainous area
of Venus, using your independent deductive expertise as to enlarge or
magnify this extensively mountainous terrain of Venus that I’ve
focused upon, really shouldn’t be asking too much. *Most of modern
PhotoZoom and numerous other photographic software variations tend to
accomplish this enlargement process automatically (including iPhone
and Safari image zooming), although some extra applied filtering and
thereby image enhancing for dynamic range compensations (aka contrast)
can further improve upon the end result (no direct pixel modifications
should ever be necessary, because it’s all a derivative from the
original Magellan radar imaging of 36 confirming radar scans/pixel,
that can always be 100% verified).
“GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow...
*http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif
*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth#
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth
Venus”, GuthVenus
It's not just our NSA/CIA PRISM that's tapping into our data.
http://www.sfgate.com/technology/art...ks-4273405.php
|