View Single Post
  #4  
Old September 19th 06, 02:41 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Frank Glover[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 353
Default Outlaw Space Tourist!?

wrote:

Not trying to split hairs here, (But), aren't you forgetting all the
other funds, we have poured into russia for nuke clean-up, and security
issues. We have been keeping them from falling on the face since the
wall fell, (LOL). They are now flush with oil cash, (but who knows whos
getting it). Graf and His Brother are running amok over there. You may
be a little to selective in the old mem. dept, (as it relates to who
wrote, what checks, in a pinch). Yes we have vested too much control in
NASA, but since it is still in service, (How about that Lotto?)! I do
hope Space X gets the Dragon Flying! It would be great to see the
market get some control, (and force United Space AL. and the other
goons to produce, (rather than get paid draw pretty pictures, of
projects that never produce real hardware)). Remember Clinton, and the
Tenn. Robot, left us with this mess to clean up all the way around,
(i.e., X-33, CRV, Faster Better Cheaper, (Al Gores Russian Love Party,
(i.e. the I.S.S.)). The one good thing about G.B.'s Idoits is at least
they are putting on a show of cleaning house, (I just wish they would
go further, (Flame thrower maybe, (LOL))).

Have a great night!

Carl


The accuracy or falsity of the above being as it may, NASA has
*zero* interest in spaceflight lotteries. Simple as that. And I doubt
Congress would support it, if they did.

--

Frank

You know what to remove to reply...

Check out my web page:
http://www.geocities.com/stardolphin1/link2.htm

"To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the
human spirit."
- Stephen Hawking