View Single Post
  #62  
Old April 15th 09, 03:42 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

"Jeff Findley" wrote:

:
:"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
hdakotatelephone...
:
: Derek Lyons wrote:
: They did - but by the time they did they weren't military hardware,
: they were obsolescent relics.
:
:
: Titan II wasn't obsolescent at the time; it had a far greater throw weight
: than Minuteman, allowing it to carry a very large yield warhead, and
: stayed in service till 1987.
:
:True, but they were still relics. They required large, fixed launch silos
:which were easier to hit than the visions for more mobile solid fueled based
:ICBM's (e.g. Minuteman was to be such a system, but was actually deployed in
:silos).
:

Minuteman was never designed or intended to be mobile. USAF wanted to
deploy a few handfuls of them on rail cars, but that never happened as
anything but half a dozen test runs.

Something called 'Midgetman' was intended to be a mobile system, but
it was never developed and was a completely different missile.

--
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore,
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
--George Bernard Shaw