On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:09:34 -0000, "Androcles"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc" Hw@.. wrote in message
.. .
| On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:48:21 -0800 (PST), Darwin123
| wrote:

| from A to B equals the ``time'' it requires to travel from B to A."
| If the two clocks are synchronous. You conveniently didn't clip
| that part. Your quotation above is embedded in a discussion on the
| meaning of simultaneous. However:
| "Observers moving with the moving rod would thus find that the two
| clocks were not synchronous, while observers in the stationary system
| would declare the clocks to be synchronous".
|
| Simultaneity is not in any way determined by the human visual system.
|
He's way off base to begin with. There are no "two clocks" in Einstein's
third postulate that the lying Jew called a definition, confused drosen
invented them.

Just as a matter of interest, little eric just informed me that the speed of
light is 1 nanosecond/foot.

Doesn't this epitomize the quality of the Einstein worshipper.