On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 11:22:39 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More
dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion
disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on
look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes.
They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that
point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space.

Double-A

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

--
Daniel

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert


Precisely!

Double-A