On Sunday, January 12, 2014 9:54:23 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:01:34 AM UTC-8, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:

'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:



;1261229']On 1/6/2014 10:51 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:-







'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:-



;1261145']On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:-







There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and



where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull



force



would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed



weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a



better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of



gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to



molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two



objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a



different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are



separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses



in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has



no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the



nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required



to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore,



gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus



and



equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy.



Jaakko Kurhi







-







Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together



and







there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what



exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with



anything







(not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained)







Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is



absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether,



making







this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling



force.-







Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together



and







there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what



exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with



anything



(not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained)







Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post.



I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this



case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom.



To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a



binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together.



For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be



equal to nuclear energy



when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in



between objects.



Jaakko Kurhi



-







It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with



Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755.







It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with



Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755.







Mass is a smallest known and active entity in the universe.



The creature who can come up with a formula to convert aether (?) to



mass,



solves the greatest secret of the universe.







JK



















--



JAAKKO KURHI



Perhaps entangled photons as representing a 3D photon of nonzero mass may be the required steppingstone between aether and mass.



Aether (aka dark matter) may be simply entangled photons.

I don't think we can go further than to say particles of matter are condensations of aether.