On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:01:34 AM UTC-8, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:
'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:

;1261229']On 1/6/2014 10:51 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:-



'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:-

;1261145']On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:-



There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and

where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull

force

would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed

weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a

better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of

gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to

molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two

objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a

different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are

separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses

in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has

no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the

nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required

to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore,

gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus

and

equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy.

Jaakko Kurhi



-



Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together

and



there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what

exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with

anything



(not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained)



Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is

absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether,

making



this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling

force.-



Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together

and



there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what

exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with

anything

(not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained)



Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post.

I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this

case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom.

To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a

binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together.

For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be

equal to nuclear energy

when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in

between objects.

Jaakko Kurhi

-



It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with

Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755.



It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with

Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755.



Mass is a smallest known and active entity in the universe.

The creature who can come up with a formula to convert aether (?) to

mass,

solves the greatest secret of the universe.



JK









--

JAAKKO KURHI

Perhaps entangled photons as representing a 3D photon of nonzero mass may be the required steppingstone between aether and mass.

Aether (aka dark matter) may be simply entangled photons.