View Single Post
  #1633  
Old December 1st 06, 02:30 PM posted to sci.space.policy
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,344
Default Worthy of survival

hey randy have you read up on bioastrautics yet, or do you still stand
by youre incorrect posts on this thread.


Rand Simberg wrote:
On 28 Oct 2006 10:42:50 -0700, in a place far, far away,
"columbiaaccidentinvestigation"
made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

Then wayne stated: " Hey wayne, Im glad you're starting to understand
the effects I can't "start" doing what I've done all along. When are
you going to catch on to the fact that these effects are irrelevant to
the scenario being discussed? (Projecting based on past experience in
this thread, never.) And in addition to that, are completely irrelevant
to the scenario being discussed. "

Now posting a statement about the effects of "hypo" gravity, (or
times when an inter planetary traveling space crew will encounter
boosted levels of gravity), (or times when the crew is experiencing
very low levels of gravity) "micro" gravity, and the effects those
humans go through in those changing conditions is just as valid, as
both are conditions the human body will be exposed to during the long
term stays in an artificial spun 1g environment,


The body will *not be exposed to hypogravity in a spun 1 gee
environment*. Why are you wasting the group's time with your
inability to understand the meanings of words and basic physics?

You need to get a new hobby in which to indulge your apparent
obsessive/compulsive predilections. You're appallingly bad at this
one.