Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:32 +0100, Charles D. Bohne wrote:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:38:03 GMT, "Silouen"
wrote:

I can't do anything about the "no hard evidence until first contact"
thing. But what I CAN do is wait and see if one of you asks the Right
Question. Who will it Be? will it be You?

Silouen

Ok, let's try this one: Why the fu*k do you talk of "first contact" when
alien presence has been here since the begining of human times?

No only since 628.


Or that one: what's so important about the public acceptance of aliens on
this planet?

The fact it's only a hoax?

And last not least: what is there to gain from aliens who prefered to stay
hidden in the closet for most of our history?

C.

Again, no proof. Back to elementary school, Chuckweasel.


And my answer to this questions is: it's not even as important as the
results of last month's soccer games. .. It might be big news for a day,
and that's all there is to it. A trapped kitten or a bloody murder-scene
has much more news-appeal. Most people are not interested in "aliens" of
any kind.

Except for raghead "aliens".

I know what to do -- Ch*ck could threaten to have them deported to
Israel.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004

"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...