In article ,
(LaDonna Wyss) wrote:

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
.. .
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
3. My own, independent investigation has not only confirmed Scott's
allegations

How about all that folderol about a switch? Did your investigation prove
beyond a doubt that the piece of metal he yaks about on some switch was in
fact the cause of the fire?

"Folderol?" My, aren't we prim! Good thing I studied English in
college. :-) The legal standard is beyond a REASONABLE doubt, and
yes it has.

First of all, the legal standard for murder is one thing that "scott"
has never been capable of proving to anyone save you. Second of all,
your previous post referenced medical terminology that you are
apparently parroting without comprehension. Third, the usual standard
for medical proof in a legal context is merely to a reasonable degree of
medical certainty - which boils down to a preponderance of the evidence
or simply more likely than not.

And no, "scott" hasn't proven anything to anyone save yourself.

The RCS A/C roll switch was hard shorted to ground, and
that short caused multiple problems all along Main B from the moment
Apollo One was powered up at 9:45 that morning. I've tracked the
electrical problems as well as the other so-called "anomalies" that
occurred that day, and they all tie directly to that short.
And, as for the piece of metal, you do understand the concept of a
hard short (aka "dead" short)?

And you now demonstrate that you're not an engineer or forensic examiner.

Continue googling the group for the past year or so and when you can
respond to Jay Windley's posts, point by point (which "scott" failed to
do, repeatedly), maybe someone will take you seriously.

Until then you're just another conspiratorial loon as well as an
apologist for "scott."

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
Columbia Loss FAQ:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html