On 17/01/2015 3:20 PM, William Mook wrote:
On Saturday, January 17, 2015 at 4:55:07 PM UTC+13, Sylvia Else
wrote:
On 17/01/2015 2:46 PM, William Mook wrote:
On Saturday, January 17, 2015 at 2:27:44 PM UTC+13, Sylvia Else
wrote:
On 16/01/2015 6:19 PM, William Mook wrote:

I said these things can be built and explain why they would
be relatively inexpensive and because of this low expense
relative to larger systems more things can be tried out.

So you're looking for someone to fund your R&D. Presumably
they'll want significant equity in your business as a result.

Sylvia.

You are putting words in my mouth Sylvia. I never asked anyone
to fund any research.

I merely said I am happy to share information with qualified
buyers who sign enforceable agreements to keep what they learn
secret.

I have said what I have for sale.

I have told you why I won't show photos of what I'm doing and
given a reasonable explanation of why that is.

In response you have been very unfair in interpreting things and
now are putting words in my mouth.

You seem far fairer and open minded than others who have at
every turn attempted to slander me, but you are abandoning that
pretense to fairness in these comments.


You seem to have admitted that there's no working hardware,

I never said that at all.

so the basic R&D has not yet been completed.

Didn't say that either.

If you haven't launched it, then you haven't completed the basic R&D.

If you have launched it, it's scarcely credible that there's no footage.


You really have nothing to sell,

That's quite the opposite of what I've said.

So you have something to sell, but what you have has not yet been
launched. Why would there be prospective buyers?


yet you're talking about buyers.

Yes.

A reasonable interpretation is that you're hoping they'll front the
cash so that you can build a prototype.

Your understanding of finance is rather limited for you to say that.

I think not.


If it doesn't work, the buyer won't get their money back,

Wait a minute, you asserted something that wasn't true, and are no
arguing from your false assertion a false conclusion. shrug It
may make sense to you, but only if you accept the baseless assertions
you're selling! lol.

so they'd be taking a development risk.

Nonsense.

So you aren't going to accept money from prospective buyers?

Sylvia.