View Single Post
  #892  
Old November 28th 11, 10:57 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Androcles[_66_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 94
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Scientific Establishment'?


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
...
| On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:33:01 -0000, "Androcles"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| .. .
| | On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:31:03 -0000, "Androcles"
| | wrote:
|
| | | I have not used L = R because that is impossible.
| | |
| | | I have used L = 1.01 R and L = 1.003 R which is close enough to 1.
| | |
| | What you should have is this:
| | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...pistonY&dY.JPG
| | Microsoft Excel can draw the impossible, stupid Wilson can't follow a
| | simple instruction. **** off, you are a moron.
| |
| | I have produced your blue curve for different values of L/R as the
ratio
| | approaches 1. Mine just happens to be upside down, as is normal on
| | computers.
| |
| | Gawd knows what your pink curve is.
| |
| |
| Don't worry about it, a ****ing moron that can't do as asked can never
| understand what it is. I have used L = R because the ****ing idiot
Wilson
| says it is impossible.
|
| It is a mechanical impossibility, not a mathematical one.

You are groping at straws trying to cover your arse because you ****ed
up. The pink curve is dy[t] = scale * (y[t]-y[t-1])+k, but you don't need
arrays. You can't ****ing read because you know it all. Nobody can
teach you anything because you refuse to learn.