View Single Post
  #12  
Old February 10th 20, 01:47 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default we need more than a single planet

Il giorno lunedì 10 febbraio 2020 13:12:03 UTC+1, Jeff Findley ha scritto:
In article ,
says...
The violation of the principle of action and reaction necessarily involves the redefinition of the I and II principle of dynamics ... ..
inertia law is no longer a uniform rectilinear motion and F = m*a it is no longer the same.

What do I mean? That you can get out of Newtonian mechanics and build other spaceships that reach the rocky planets light years away.

Spaceships that need kilopower nuclear reactors.
But first I have to defend the F432 patent and demonstrate the PNN to a NASA that is deaf and wastes time with missiles.
Who among you can contact one of NASA who comes to see PNN tests?

Unfortunately, the PNN is incredible, but it's another world


Off to the bozo bin for you (a.k.a. the killfile).


I think you are unable to read even the translator
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg





Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.