Ian Parker wrote:
:
:Of course not, but if they have not been developed there is a reason.
:Are you claiming that that reason is bureaucracy pure and simple. If
:it is it is really quite a staggering claim.
:

Bureaucracy and politics. ISS would have been a much better station
without those two (which requires dropping the 'I').

For example, it probably would have been a much better station if they
had ****canned the original design when the price kept going up and
the capabilities kept going down and had listened to Lowell Wood's
ideas.


--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
-- Charles Pinckney