On Sep 19, 8:37*pm, "David Staup" wrote:
"oriel36" wrote in message


* "If the Earth didn't rotate, then all the stars would stay in place, and
observing the night sky at high power would be easy."

obviously you have never looked through a scope at high power! the limiting
factor is NOT the earth's rotation....it's the seeing (atmospheric
instability)

I said the opposite,in the absence of daily rotation,the Earth has a
single daylight/darkness cycle with the polar coordinates acting as a
window into this orbital component.It is by far the single largest
modification in astronomy as it introduces a traveling axis about
which the polar coordinates,representative of all locations on
Earth,turn with respect to the central Sun with a 360 degree rotation
coincident with the orbital period of the planet.

The Earth's daily rotation and orbital motion have very definitive
parameters separately and in combination with the effects linking
variations in the length of the natural noon cycle tied to the
explanation for the seasons,both involving dual axes corresponding to
two separate daylight/darkness cycles.The polar daylight/darkness
cycle is easily understood using an imitation analogy or drawing on
the unique features of Uranus which provide an orbital longitude
meridian for the planetary orbital trait,in the 7 year period
shown,the orbital turning of Uranus is roughly 30 degree -

http://www.daviddarling.info/images/...gs_changes.jpg

You are part of a cult so I don't expect anything further from
you,the sequence of images require an able interpreter and they are
hard to come by presently,in short,the seasons are explained by two
dynamics and not 'tilt' to the Sun or anything else,the seasons are
caused by two separate rotations to the central Sun indicative of two
motions with the polar daylight/darkness cycle reflecting the orbital
trait.I need people to either snap out of their lethargy or grow up
insofar as the study of global climate hasn't even started yet.