On Jan 22, 10:15*am, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:
"Jack Linthicum" wrote in message

...

Look at the NASA budget for that period, if there is a heading for
"advanced devlopment" there is a program.

http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4214/app2.html



This is in many ways an argument about syntax.

A "program" doesn't necessarily mean a consistent, well-thought out project
or real focus.
i.e. yes, money was spent. *Yes, people were paid. *But there wasn't a real
focus or even goal.
So stuff like AAP had a lot of hand-waving and goals, but unlike "Land a man
on the moon and return him safely..." no real focus or ultimate goal.

--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.

This one even calls it the Saturn-Apollo Applications (SAA) Program
Office

http://altairvi.blogspot.com/2008/03...cations-summar...