View Single Post
  #4  
Old January 25th 04, 08:16 PM
Joe Strout
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers

In article ,
(ed kyle) wrote:

The problem with this is that Proton has been the driver
of launch cost reduction in recent years. With it out
of the picture, launch prices would rise from current
levels. Since U.S. companies seem incapable of competing
in the commercial launch world market, Arianespace would
then, by default, get to decide how much NASA would have
to pay to launch each lunar mission.


So you don't believe SpaceX will be able to deliver at their quoted
prices ($6M for Falcon I, $12M for Falcon V)?

Also, I notice you didn't mention SeaLaunch -- I haven't looked at the
numbers recently, but AIUI they're fairly cheap and can launch into
pretty much any orbit you want.

,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: |
|
http://www.macwebdir.com |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'