On 5/18/20 3:27 PM, wrote:
From talk.origins

Il giorno lunedì 18 maggio 2020 00:50:01 UTC+2, Wolffan ha scritto:
On 17 May 2020, wrote
(in ):

Il giorno domenica 17 maggio 2020 06:45:02 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 14:43:10 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by :

Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 23:30:04 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 03:51:34 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by :


I am tired to repeat to everyone what is written in links in www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm

If the action reaction is violated (III principle) ..... change the inertia law ( I principle) and F=ma ( II ) .... so all is different from what you think.

I found in test that F=ma increase with time at the same electric power.
You think as newtonian man but but PNN is NON newtonian !!!!!!
It is very difficult to understand if you don't make NON newtonian experiments.

Read here more in
https://www.okpal.com/building-a-rea...space-ship/?#/

This year F432 patent will be filed so everyone can reapeat the PNN experiments.

We don't need more money to produce the collapse of astronautics to suppositories.

We just want to enjoy the spectacle of what will happen when the know-how of the pnn is known :-)


I've gotta side with Calmagorod on this one. I'm a hair's width away
from putting "Jeff Findley" in my killfile because of this "anti-pnn"
fantasy.