Thread
:
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
View Single Post
#
5
August 18th 11, 10:56 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Poutnik[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 34
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
In article ,
|
| Receiver distance to satellite is calculated from difference
| of received timestamps and receiver time synced to satellite clock.
|
| The relativistic time error 38 us/day
| is causing cumulative distance error 120 m /15 minutes,
| as shown in other thread.
|
| But receiver accepts this errorneous time as its own by sychronization.
| Then satellite distance calculated as
| L = c . [(receiver clock + rel. error)
I didn't know my cell phone had an atomic clock...
Sure it does not, just a quartz clock.
By receiver clock I meant receiver clock time, sorry for confusion.
It just keeps its time synced with atomic clock of satellites,
from 4 equations determining 3D coordinates and its clock error.
Otherwise it would not be able to determine satellite distance
with needed time accuracy 10 ns for 3 meters.
--
Poutnik
Poutnik[_2_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Poutnik[_2_]
Find all threads started by Poutnik[_2_]