View Single Post
  #5  
Old June 22nd 07, 04:04 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,alt.politics.bush
GO Mavs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default NASA - National Atmospheric and Space Administration


"Jonathan" wrote in message
...

"kT" wrote in message
...
NASA - National Atmospheric and Space Administration

I like the sound of that. That's going to be your new NASA in 2009.



Well they better start making themselves useful again.
Where the public looks at NASA as an agency that
gives us answers, not more problems.

Diverting more and more resources to go back to the
moon is exactly the opposite of that. Less and less
answers with ever growing waste.

It's so sad to see the Big Interests take NASA apart
piece by piece for their own short-term enrichment.


Jonathan


Bush has done all the wrong things when it comes to NASA.. He tried cutting
funds with Hubble and decided on going back to the moon by 2019. A man will
land on the moon in 12 years to start building a moonstation. I may agree
with that at the most and mostly to explore its resources (ideally
hydrogen), but going to Mars is ridiculous. Billions of dollars when we have
nations here that have people who need to be freed and brought into
civilization.

Sheesh. I would rather be spending on a NHC than sending a man to Mars. It
would cost the same and bring the same results.. SH_T!