Jonathan wrote:

"kT" wrote in message
...
NASA - National Atmospheric and Space Administration

I like the sound of that. That's going to be your new NASA in 2009.


Well they better start making themselves useful again.

That's the whole point, Jonathan, and the best way to start doing that
is with a simple name change, which effectively splits the
responsibility of the atmosphere between two premier science agencies.

Where the public looks at NASA as an agency that
gives us answers, not more problems.

We demonstrably no longer need any aeronautical answers from NASA.

Diverting more and more resources to go back to the
moon is exactly the opposite of that. Less and less
answers with ever growing waste.

Right, but the present administration is a wash. We know we won't get
anything out of them so by default it has to be the next administration.

It's so sad to see the Big Interests take NASA apart
piece by piece for their own short-term enrichment.

Time to clean the house and senate too.

--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html