"John Maxson" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"John Maxson" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Charleston" wrote in message
news:RT0Kc.8074$%p4.4337@okepread04...
wrote:

Scott, are you even old enough to drink????

What kind of question is that?

This person with his
pseudonyms has never once posted anything but his retarded
so-called
analyses on Apollo One.

You realize you cite no one for us to connect your post to, yet you
are
critical of Scott?

Name ONE person this moron has talked to with
regard to the fire. He cannot, and neither can you.

How do you know?

Why? Because
this idiot, like Scott, wants to just spew out soundbites,
responsibility be damned, and they don't want to have to act like
real
people with a real responsibility to the facts.

This is rich. Would you please go back and actually respond to a
post
so we
can at least have some remote clue who you are talking about?

It is NO surprise you
would be sucked into this game; you have NO CLUE how to deal with
real
life.

Uh, I am thinking Scott flies a big plane to far away real places
and
then
flies the big plane back with real packages in his plane. That
sounds
like
real life to me.

You've got your "F" keys, and that is all your grade-school
teacher taught you.

There are not very many highly skilled pilots who stopped at the
sixth
grade
education level. Perhaps you could enlighten us since you are a
Junior
in
college, IIRC.

I do fail to see how negative personal posts directed at Scott place
you
in
the apparently highly respected position of being an ally of
Scott's.

Daniel

OK, Daniel, I see you didn't keep up with the context of the post to
which you are responding. That was directed at Hedrick, who has
suddenly decided he is best friends with that anonymous "buddy" of
Scott Grissoms. That was the conversation you apparently intercepted.
I believe I posted that reply directly to a post by Scott Hedrick;
I'm surprised you didn't see it.
LaDonna

For anyone wishing to explore how Google 2 works, only 38 clicks in the
subject thread are required for verification. With DSL, that shouldn't
have
taken long at all, even for the group's ostensibly overworked busy
beavers.

Thanks, although I would be curious to know what "Google 2" is. I've
only used Google labs and the actual Google. Sheer curiousity; I
don't have a lot of time to be an Internet "busy beaver." (I know who
you meant.) I sign on, take care of business, and go on. :-)
LaDonna

Good point, obviously I'm far from perfect. It's actually called Google
Groups Beta, I guess:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.space.history

OH! lol I didn't intend it as a "point;" I honestly thought I was
missing out on something. :-)
LaDonna