"Peter Webb" wrote:
in message u...
Do you believe the predictions of SR as they relate
to the so-called Twin's Paradox are correct?

hanson wrote:
Webb, for the n-th time again. Listen up Webb:
There are not 2 but there are 4 choices for you:

1) Go look into the mirror. You'll see guy in the
mirror who asks, over and over again, every
48 hrs, what you've just posted, over and over
again.... because he is too ****ing lazy or stupid,
too drunk, senile, medicated, loaded, or otherwise
intellectually challenged to investigate and answer
the question to his own satisfaction, & even worse,

2) Webb, you are so badly ****ed up that you can't
even decide which one out of the many answers to
accept as being correct that you get from the many
very kind posters.

3) Webb, since neither choice (1) nor (2) did it for
you, you should begin to suspect that SR is a crock
o'****, because if SR were a useful theory then you
would have found what you are looking for by now,
instead of you doing (1) over and over again.

4) Shall I repost for you, Peter, what Einstein himself
said about the crock o'**** that is called SR & GR?

Thanks for the laughs you Dreidel... ahahaha... ahahanson