On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 15:15:10 -0500, Davoud wrote:
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
No. It is incorrect, although arguably poetic, to describe
motion in vacuum
as “floating”. Floating requires a substance to float on
(e.g. water) or
in (e.g. air), but “vacuum” means the absence of any
substance.
There is no such thing as a vacuum. Nature doesn't just abhor a
vacuum,
it forbids it.

True. There are neutrinos everywhere...