View Single Post
  #4  
Old September 4th 03, 09:39 PM
CC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fusion poisons; why fission has none

In article , Raziel wrote:

"CC" wrote in message
...
In article , Raziel wrote:

"Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message
...
Does anyone know what percentage of a star's mass of iron that the

star
explodes into a
nova or supernova. What percentage of iron in a star core that renders

it
to a nova stage?

try looking it up. there are pleanty of references out there.

Raz


You ignorant twit. Every reference is based upon unsubstantiated
theory. No facts. What a blooming knee jerk reaction fool you are.

very constructive.

Raz


Damn rights it is. You're a super jackass and just in case you're
going around thinking that you're helpful you need to be re-informed
about just what kind of a dull brained prick of a person you really
are. It is evident that you equate incompetent nonsensical theories
which themselves are not products of reason nor logic but rather of
intellectual masturbations that have no basis in reality with physical
reality. It is easy to show that using only the simplest axiom of
motion between quanta and Maxwell's equations that nuclear fusion
doesn't work like the textbooks say that it does. This is something
that is not only substantiated by the data but follows all the rules of
logical deduction. The problem is that nitwits like you eschew reason
and hate deductive logic because it reveals what intellectual
regurgitating twits you really are.

CC