Il giorno mercoledì 26 febbraio 2020 23:55:24 UTC+1, ha scritto:
Il giorno mercoledì 26 febbraio 2020 14:16:39 UTC+1, David Spain ha scritto:
Nor do I. PNN has nothing to do with space or space policy.

I suggest you try sci.physics.

If you want a fair hearing from knowledgeable people I suggest you
submit your papers to a peer-reviewed physics journal.

Barring that, an established professor at a university or maybe one of
your own college instructors, who might sponsor your paper to the peer
reviewed journal. This is the way science and engineering is done.

Hopefully I'll read about your breakthrough in a journal. Until then.

*plonk*

Mr. Spain

It is comical that you say to Doctor Who that the pnn has nothing to do with space when it has been 50 years since missiles have even managed to put a permanent base on the moon. A propulsion system that loses more than 99% of the mass to get to and from the moon is at least a comic propulsion system.
However, I don't mind publishing the developments of the PNN in a peer reviewed journal that will subject to censorship or to time delays, since we at ASPS have had called Nova Astronautica where our research has been published since 1981


www.asps.it/novafiorenza.htm


even without the consent of the clever and useless trumpet astronautics.
Now a patent of the new pnn will be filed and experimental demonstrations of the know-how of the F432 pnn will be given to a certain public. The demonstrations will also be in our urls. So the situation will evolve in this way. Someone curious will start to reproduce what will be said of a pnn that is not that of 1998.
Those who will not do it or will delay because of imbecility to verify what the ASPS will say, will be astronautically dead. Rockets will become museum stuff and those who don't change their mental paradigm will self-destruct. But everything will happen without warning because in war, surprise is a great advantage.

E.Laureti