RichA wrote in
:

On Saturday, 13 January 2018 08:29:07 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:24:01 AM UTC-7, Gary
Harnagel wrote:

One thing is certain, though: Climate models have NOT taken
these phenomena into account. Consequently, there must be
some doubt in their ability to give accurate predictions and
more than a little doubt in those who have loudly proclaimed
that the science is settled.

The standard 11-year sunspot cycle is known, and thus can be
predicted, but not unexpected changes in solar activity.

But even if climate models ignored solar activity entirely, all
that would mean is that the effects of an increased carbon
dioxide concentration in the atmosphere might be hastened or
delayed.

The greenhouse effect itself isn't in doubt, only the details
are. Using doubt about the details as an excuse to avoid taking
the action needed to prevent a catastrophe is not responsible.

John Savard

"Catastrophe." Why is it the greenloons LOVE to use scare words
so much?

Because people won't buy books telling them everything is fine,
nothing to worry about.

--
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.