On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:03:59 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...

On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:17:45 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message



...



On Monday, September 23, 2013 10:53:05 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:



"Brad Guth" wrote in message







...







On Monday, September 23, 2013 8:18:31 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:







Even though the Earth/Planet X impact theory hasn't changed, the time

of







the















event has slipped by a 100 Million years, a mere blink of the eye in

the















Solar System's elapsed-time table ...































http://news.yahoo.com/moon-100-milli...121148745.html















The likely planets, planetoids and asteroids of the Sirius star system

are







only at most 256 million years old, and at least some of that stuff

having







survived Sirius(b) when it converted from an enormous red giant and

became



a







white dwarf as of roughly 64 million years ago.















Can gold deposits be carbon dated, or even lead dated?















How about the age dating of carbonado, or even paramagnetic basalt?















*** What does any of your insanity laced ranting and raving have to do



with







the Moon ???















Notice to Moron GuthBall:







http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius







It's a fun read, but I doubt it'll do anything for your creeping

insanity.







Our moon wasn't likely made of Earth, as we've been purely indoctrinated

to



believe, but then you'll believe anything your ZNR buddies have to say.







The size of item which created its 2500 km crater was perhaps one of 6371

km



radius, that was a glancing blow also responsible for creating our Arctic



ocean basin. Its paramagnetic basalt and carbonado crust is nothing like



Earth has to offer.







*** Look, moron ... at least they ran computer aided tests on the oblique



impact of planet X and the subesquent formation of the Moon and its



gradually increasing orbital distance ... so it makes a lot more sense

than



your pulled-out-of-your-ass tlithobreaking theory (whatever that means)

and



your incessant rants about the imminent encounter with Sirius and how the



moon came from ... you have not documentation on any of your brainfatrz,

nor



any supportive data ... just like the Liberal you are ... trust me, even



though I am a Community Organizer, I cam make it all better ... just trust



me. Right.







Until definitive proof is offered to the contrary, Mr. Hartmann's theory



stands the test of logic and repeatability by simulations.



They are so deathly afraid to run any alternative simulations, that they

keep running out of Depends. Even the very best impactor simulations of

extremely large and massive items is woefully deficient and thus

untrustworthy.



Your Operation Paperclip buddies still can not explain what created that

2500 km diameter crater nor whatever happened to its impactor, much less

telling us how and when our planet got its Arctic ocean basin and seasonal

tilt. As discovered and interpreted thus far, there has been none of those

extremely survival intelligent and artistically talented humans as of prior

to 10,000 BC as having depicted their version of their natural environment

with any moon, even though their having accomplished far better resolution

paintings or depictions of smaller items of much less survival importance..



Your public funded computer simulations are just that, and there's nothing

the least bit objective about any of it. So, considering alternatives seems

only logical, especially since the Apollo era (extensively run by those of

Operation Paperclip) accomplished nothing of any objective proof that can be

independently verified.



A lithobraking encounter via a glancing blow would have created our Arctic

ocean basin, the antipode of Antarctica and having tilted our icy planet if

it were impacted by a 7.5e22 kg icy planetoid. As to exactly when this took

place is what needs to be further researched and estimated as based upon the

best available evidence instead of simply based entirely upon computer

simulations that can be made and/or modified in order to suit whatever end

results are being paid for.



Are you going to suggest that early humans (like those of your kind) were

all badly nearsighted, and didn't even know the difference between day or

night, summer or winter?





*** So, other than a lot of hot air, idiotic babble and the nebulous phrase

"must be further researched", which in scientific terms means that you're

totally clueless, you have NOTHING but your cock-eyed, homebrewed "it came

from Sirius" postulation. Don't even bother to answer, unless you have

links to proof your hare-brained schemes ... but then, having no facts never

stopped you before. Read it and weep, you dip****:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis

That paramagnetic and physically dark moon could be a hundred million years newer than previously thought, or it could even be of only 256 million years old if it were contributed to our solar system by the recent demise of Sirius(b).

Until we actually get ourselves there and proceed to dig/excavate into it, we really don't seem to know what it's made of, or much less of how new or old it actually is.

Perhaps China will help us out.