You need to debunk one of Brad's theories (not difficult), but in a manner
that he feels you're trying to stifle his creative thinking and replace it
with that of the "Establishment", of which he has many adjectives that
we're all too familar with.
Unlike your all-knowing self, not each and every notion that my three
remaining dyslexic brain cells manage to assemble are worthy of being
another pot of gold. As I've said dozen and even hundreds of times
before that I've made my fair share of mistakes, and I certainly have
no intentions of slowing that process down any time soon. Last time
I'd checked, even my lose cannons are still on the poopdeck and firing
at will.
Brad takes mental gymnatsics to a whole new level, except that the judging
process is: Brad on Brad - 10, the rest of the world on Brad - 0.
Eric Chomko,
I like the sound of that one, at least it's honesty pit against
honesty, and there's not even a brown-nose in sight. Of course, I'd
like to be the one asking the questions, rather than having to
continually fend off so much incoming flak in the form of naysayism.
Isn't one of the first rules of engineering, that after you come up with
the a great idea, then being able to communicate it in such a manner that
other engineers actually get it? I think you know wher I'm going with
this...
That's a tough task when you have such limited resources, then having
nothing but these supposed all-knowing rusemasters as wizards and
engineers having no apparent sense of humor, much less even a viable
periscope for looking outside of their own box. It's as though they've
been petri dish cloned as having been initially conceived and having
lived entirely within a nuclear submarine all of their naysay lives,
except without so much as that periscope, and thereby haven't so much
as a fuzzy clue as to which planet their on.
There's certainly more to the potentials of Venusian extremophiles,
exoskeletals, flying diatoms or even somewhat survival smart human like
forms of other life on Venus than my failing eyes alone have seen.
Here's just a few of the more recent of ongoing topics (aka back
peddling as fast as each of these suckers can go before the new and
improved data start arriving from Venus EXPRESS).
Astrobiology: The Case for Venus by; Geoffrey A. Landis
http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/reports/20...003-212310.pdf
LIFE ON VENUS / By Sean Henahan
http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/SUA09/venus297.html
A Scientific Case for Venus Exploration: Venus Express and Beyond II
Posters
http://www.agu.org/meetings/fm05/fm0...fm05_P33A.html
The surface of Venus with locations of major volcano sites
http://www-atm.physics.ox.ac.uk/proj...venus-vol.html
"Rehabilitating" VENUS as a Human Destination
http://www.lunar-reclamation.org/pap...rehabpaper.htm
Astrobiology: Venus (even our NASA know how to back paddle and to
revise their past)
http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/topics/venus.html
Planetary Protection Study Group Mulls Life On Venus / By Leonard David
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...enus_life.html
Unfortunately, as of 6+ years ago, I was just another box outsider
looking to see what the heck was actually so interesting inside the big
and supposedly all-knowing box, just doing my personal best thing of
trying to make my two cents worth out of all that was being said about
say/naysay our moon, about our NASA and of where the next generations
of spendy and time consuming missions were headed as though our global
energy resources, as well as time and of all the moneys upon Earth were
unlimited.
My first mistake related to Venus was obviously for having been the
good-guy (aka nice messenger) that was being kind enough and 100% at my
expense willing to share with our NASA, as to having offered my
observationology(subjective interpretation) of what looked somewhat out
of place (aka unnatural) about one specific location on Venus. I'd no
idea that so much internal crapolla was going to hit the big-ass fan
that was within that box, and their damage-control squad of clearly
brown-nosed troops within their uplink.space.com naysay collective only
added another butt-load of insult to injury. I guess it was all of
that unexpected mainstream status quo flak that gave the green-light,
indicating that at least my locomotive from my side of hell, that was
hauling all of my lose cannons, was on a perfectly good set of tracks.
-
"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth
"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I
"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust
"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~
Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree far beyond WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very result of honest
folks having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been playing
by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident LLPOF warlord(GW
Bush).
Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm