Name them, conspiracyboi. Provide evidence that your delusional
conspiracy exists, if you can pry your slurper away from the ko0k who
has to deny physical evidence because it conflicts with his religious
beliefs.
Bookman,
I've already been there and done that. The laws of physics proves that
just about anything you'd care to argue that's related to those
supposed EVAs is so easily included in their being phony baloney, as in
bogus and otherwise nothing but LLPOF infomercial-science worthy.
Better images as obtained from Earth and of many others from satellite
(I'm including those of the official NASA/Apollo archives) are further
proof that we've not accomplished what we've been told. Not to mention
that there's still no freaking proof-tested R&D of any fly-by-rocket
lander available for the next round of efforts, and of no documentation
as to whatever supposedly existed before.

Accomplishing LL-1 is very doable and extremely important (even that's
better off than anything the USSR or Russia of today has accomplished
via manned mission), whereas going in for orbiting that nasty sucker is
about as damn risky, obviously spendy but otherwise technically doable
as it gets. Even low orbits of anything below 50 km has been downright
impossible to sustain without involving a great deal of reaction
thrusting and of having a set of powerful reaction wheels to boot. The
closer to the moon the more mascon affected things get (it's almost as
though our salty moon is semi-hollow and the shell is that of
representing a rather extremely uneven density).

Obviously tens of meters of fluffy moon dust, and/or that of large salt
deposits isn't offering very good density as compared to the
concentrations of iron, basalts and of the typically greater densities
of whatever contributed via impacting our once-upon-a-time icy
proto-moon that's likely accommodating massive geode pockets offering
little more than brine if not having crystallized into being hollow
cavern like environments.

Fantasy world he lives in? What, that the government lies about
everything, and NASA is part of the government, that is lying, and
he has seen through it?

- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
Here I'd thought that I was simply polishing upon what already existed.
-
Brad Guth