Brad, you can't talk to the . . . BORG.
tomcat,
I know, I know. That's why I have to utilize my lose cannons in order
to return the favor.
I told them about life on Mars. They attacked. I showed them pictures
of Mars showing life on the planet. They attacked. I gave them
directions to prove it for themselves by enlarging the JPL Photos.
They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the
destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe.

I explained technology to them. Informed them of NASA, and rockets,
and satellites, and Probes. They attacked. I explicated the workings
of the Space Shuttle, patiently explaining that it has flown more than
100 times and only had 2 catastrophic events -- and that isn't bad for
a Spaceship. They attacked. I designed a waverider spaceplane with
wondrous SSME engines and a slick basalt/epoxy hull. They attacked.
They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of
all sentient activity in the Universe.
Observationology simply isn't allowed, any more so than deductive
reasoning or the regular laws of physics. Of anything hard-science has
to have their pagan NASA stamp of approval, and of anything PhotoShop
is entirely taboo. In fact, seeing whatever is not believing.

Since I do not have sufficient hard-science as to other life
existing/coexisting or not upon on Mars, as such all that I can manage
is advise the likes of ourselves to find better groups and/or to
further nail down the obvious with greater information, such as to what
the sub-frozen, easily pulverised and generally TBI to death planet of
Mars has to offer, such as in the way of sharing whatever's a whole lot
tougher and of rad-hard DNA than Earth life. The same arguments and/or
topic demands certainly goes for other life as having been
existing/coexisting upon Venus.

They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of
all sentient activity in the Universe.
Where's all of those spare WMD when you need them?
-
Brad Guth