View Single Post
  #14  
Old November 26th 10, 03:45 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.particle
xxein[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default Do I understand this correctly?

On Nov 25, 11:42*am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
On Nov 24, 4:25*pm, Joe Snodgrass wrote:

Am I correct in my understanding that, although it was discovered in
1998 that the neutrino does indeed have mass, people still don't know
what that mass is? *TIA.


--------------------
mass is as Newton defined it!!

no other pompous definition does it better
2
not only the neutrino mas mass
the photon as well
ie
not relativistic mass but just mass
the only *ordinary *mass!!

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------


xxein: When you can measure an effect you can describe it as a mass-
momentun.

Is it or not?