In article ,
" writes:

In this first order approximation, all but the the 8 x 10^-5 solar mass
subpopulation have masses that are integer multiples of about 0.145
solar masses. Thus 0.145, 0.29, 0.44, 0.58 ... solar masses. Well
over 90% of the dark matter mass in the observable universe, however,
should be found in the 0.15 solar mass and 0.58 solar mass
subpopulations.

Where are all these objects, you ask?

1. Microlensing experiments many have already found evidence for large
numbers of these objects (see references in the original post).

I posted some references earlier in a similar thread which definitively
show that microlensing canNOT be the dominant cause of QSO variability.
However, if these objects exist as you claim, then they should cause
significant QSO variability through microlensing, at a level roughly
corresponding to the observed variability. Your theory made a
prediction and it was falsified. Good theory, but wrong. Move on. You
can only save your theory by "adjusting" it, by making an ad-hoc claim
that this dark matter is distributed so that it won't cause QSO
microlensing. What was your term? Epicycle.