wrote in message
...

KARI began in 1990 to develop its own rockets.

what is Kari?



produced the KSR-I
and KSR-II, one and two-stage rockets in the early 1990s.

In December 1997 it began development of a LOX/kerosene rocket engine.
KARI wished to develop satellite launch capability. A test launch of
the KSR-III took place in 2002.

is that a cable company


c) had the USA worked more openly with nations to help them orbit
payloads, there would be less incentive to develop their own launchers
- as all space faring nations cooperate to end missile proliferation.

The US does help nations orbit payloads. Openly. For that matter, why
doesn't NK use Chinese LVs to launch their satellites?

BECAUSE THE USA IS HELPING SK BUILD ITS OWN LAUNCHER IF THE USA ENDED
THAT PROGRAM THEN CHINA WOULD PUT PRESSURE ON NK TO DO THE SAME.


or did you mean AMC


mk5000






----- Original Message -----
From: "marika"
Newsgroups:
alt.support.invertebrate,alt.usenet.legends.lester-mosley,alt.support.jaw-disorders
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:39 PM
Subject: unintended long arrow


from the ny times in November

The news that the government will not buy soured mortgage assets,
along with a string of poor corporate earnings, disheartened investors
on Wednesday, sending the markets down for a third straight day this
week. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 411.30 points, or 4.7
percent, to close at 8,282.66.

I say: I don't get it. We were supposed to recoup the bailout money
when the mortgage bond market became unfrozen, and they could resell
the bonds to the tune of a very great profit that would more than
compensate the american taxpayer.

I told you they were lying and now I am proved right.
At least with the original plan, there was some glimmer of payback
this however is a hoax and was on day one

"marika" wrote in message
...
well I am glad to see that Kucinich was at least nailing Kashkari. I
don't know what he is doing now but this was good

The fact that he suspects as much as I do is somewhat telling

he got grilled mercilessly in March
Kashkari not Kucinich
with exhortations that he should resign because he has no clue what he
was
doing
good to keep them on their toes
and they should hire me
I would be transformative
and LOOK KUCINICH mentioned the tarp bonus problem way back in November
no one was paying attention


http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Wa...6230441&page=1
Lawmakers Demand to See Bailout Chief
Neel Kashkari to Testify Before Congress on Friday.
By JUSTIN ROOD
November 11, 2008
The Treasury Department's top bailout official will testify before
Congress Friday, after two congressmen wrote to demand he appear.

Assistant Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari listens on Capitol Hill in
Washington, Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008, during a Senate Banking Committee
hearing on the U.S. financial crisis.
(Gerald Herbert/AP Photo)
The department rejected an earlier request by Reps. Dennis Kucinich,
D-Ohio, and Darrell Issa, R-Calif., for Neel Kashkari, Interim
Assistant Secretary for the Treasury for Financial Stability, to
appear at a hearing slated for Friday, the two lawmakers said.


Kucinich and Issa are the chairman and ranking member of the Domestic
Policy Subcommittee of the House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee, respectively.


Kashkari's appearance is "imperative," the two told Treasury Secretary
Henry M. Paulson, Jr., in a letter dated Tuesday. "There are serious
questions," the duo said, whether the $700 billion Troubled Assets
Relief Program could actually stabilize the economy, as Congress and
the Bush administration intended.

Related
Who's Minding the Bailout?Wall Street Titans Blasted on Capitol
HillComplete Blotter Coverage: Wall Street of Shame
Kashkari testified before a Senate panel late last month. But his
testimony - and subsequent responses from Treasury officials to House
staffers -- were mostly "generalizations," the lawmakers wrote
Paulson.


Kucinich and Issa cited news reports that banks have used some of the
$250 billion from TARP to buy other financial institutions and pay
bonuses - not to make new loans and thaw credit markets, which the
economy needs.


"The time has come for the Treasury Department to speak clearly and
definitively to Congress and the American people about its plans for
the extraordinary sums Congress has authorized," the lawmakers wrote.