In message , Chuck Farley
writes
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:38:59 GMT, "Jimmie"
wrote:


"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...

"Jimmie" wrote in message
. com...
[....]
Anyway I dont think Hubble's observation were very definitive and what he
saw may have been an illusion of sorts because I believe that the universe
could be contracting even though matter in the universe may be moving
further apart. Of course he may have been absolutly correct, I just think
the data does not support the findings well enough to give it the
credability it has received.

Why the Big Bang is Wrong

http://www.angelfire.com/az/BIGBANGisWRONG/


Slight problem - the cosmological red shift isn't a Doppler effect.
Second problem - it's independent of wavelength, so it isn't a Compton
effect.
His estimate of the age of the Universe is out of date.
And he's making the same mistake about colliding galaxies you did.
Next :-)
--
What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report.
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.