View Single Post
  #3  
Old April 29th 04, 06:14 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why Oil Is Still Being Used As Fuel HYDROGEN FUEL TECHNOLOGY: Super-Efficient Electrolysis

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:07:16 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

[newsgroups where Alexa is on-topic restored]

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:47:39 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:05:02 -0700, The_Sage wrote:

Reply to article by: *
Date written: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:22:29 GMT
m

Wow.
Sounds like perpetual motion!

That what all the disinformation agents say.

So everybody who disagrees with you is a "disinformation agent"? Wow!
Sounds
like another gullible blind faith believer falling back on the ol'
conspiracy
theory.

The oil industry is able to obtain enough hydrogen to manufacture gasoline
for the entire world. And hydrogen is a much more efficient fuel than
gasoline. Why are we still burning gasoline in cars?

Before making yourself appear to be a ignorant halfwit yet again, I
recommend learning just a few basic facts about petrochemicals.


The only other thing we need to learn about petrochemicals, other than they
are no longer needed for fuel production and haven't been needed for fuel
production for decades, is that the petrochemical business is a monopoly of
a few who are backing the defense contractors who now are running the US
government.


If your insane klaims above are true, why then do Japan and China
import petroleum?


Because they're at the mercy of defense contractors which also control
science and technology, aka Lockheed.

Let me guess, their governments are lackeys of the
evil defense contractors also.


Essentially yes. Defense contractors are in control of technology and
science.

Did the reptilians feed this roadkill into your skull?


I don't vote republican.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation
Agent, and "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet.