a_plutonium wrote:


I am not surprized that Dirac never realized his monopole was so close
at hand-- Saturn's Ring. I mean, he was so very close since he
discovered space as an ocean of positrons and he discovered a "new
radioactivity" which would build stars and solar systems and galaxies.
And yet just one tiny step more-- Saturn's Ring -- implies a monopole.



I should clarify the above paragraph for I have experienced these
circumstances in my own creative talent of doing physics and science.
On at least 2 occasions that I can recall, where I found a truth in
science, yet unable to make a tiny step forward to set correct another
truth of science.

Back in 1990 when I discovered the Atom Totality theory, for which the
theory of biological evolution was a prompt and spur and motivation and
after I discovered the Atom Totality theory it took me many years
afterwards to realize that biological evolution was no longer true and
that Superdeterminism had to replace Evolution. So what I am saying is
that it is difficult in science to sometimes take that tiny extra step
forward and solve more problems.

And then once the mind has taken the tiny step forward, in hindsight we
can laugh at ourselves as to why it took so long to realize that tiny
step.

So I am not mocking Dirac or making less of his physics talent, in
fact, in my esteem Dirac was ten times a greater physicist than was
Einstein, because Dirac was so far ahead of his century that just now
in this 21st century we are catching up to Dirac's spurs and proddings
and vanguard. Dirac was one of the few quantum physicists that knew
quantum physics was far more important than Einstein's General
Relativity which is easy to see as anti-quantum physics.

Dirac felt that monopoles must exist, and they do. He felt this way
because he realized that more beauty would come of physics with
monopoles because the Maxwell Equations would be perfectly symmetrical.
And Dirac knew that ugliness in physics is probably muddleheaded
physics.

Dirac discovered that Space is a ocean of positrons.

Dirac intuited a "cosmic radioactivity" as outlined in his book
Directions in Physics.

So why did not Dirac realize that Saturn's Ring is a result of Space
being a monopole?

Well, Dirac did not have an Atom Totality theory. I had an Atom
Totality theory and it took me over 10 years to find a picture of
gravity. So if it was hard for me to finally see the picture on gravity
having the Atom Totality theory, think of how hard it would have been
for Dirac to say "yes, Saturn Ring must be a monopole structure and
thus Space as ocean of positrons is a monopole".

In fact, monopole structure does not end with Saturn's Ring, it just
begins there. Because our Sun with its planets is a monopole structure
where the planets are likened to the Ring of Saturn. The asteroid belt
is a imitation of a part of the Ring of Saturn. Distant galaxies when
viewed by Hubble is a Saturn for its nucleus and its stars form a Ring.

So wherever there is mass and matter, there is gravity, and wherever
there is gravity for long periods of time there is going to be a
geometry of Saturn's Ring. Why? Because Space is a ocean of positrons
that attracts mass and matter and that is what gravity is.

The theory of General Relativity had gotten only a 1/2 truth. It is
correct that "mass bends space and other mass follows the curvature of
that bent space". But GR never explains what space is. It treats space
as a physical entity but when it calculates something like Mercury
precession or starlight deflection, it treats Space as a vacuum.
So the calculations of GR only give at most 1/2 of the full and correct
answer. In the case of Mercury precession it gives only 1/100 of the
full answer. In the case of Solar deflection of starlight it gives only
1/2 of the correct answer. Why does GR miss so much? Because gravity is
a magnetic phenomenon and it misses the magnetic field of the Sun or
Jupiter or whatevery astro body it is calculating. GR obviously never
ties gravity as a EM phenomenon and so GR could never be the truth
behind "What is Gravity?"

Dirac came so very close. But I guess it required the Atom Totality
theory first in order to assemble (1) Dirac's monopole quest (2)
Dirac's ocean of positrons = space (3) Dirac's new radioactivities. It
took me 16 years from 1990 with the Atom Totality to finally make it
here to the finish line.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies