View Single Post
  #2  
Old September 6th 07, 11:06 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
meda
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default BEYOND EINSTEIN MONEY-SPINNER

"Pentcho Valev" wrote

A French Einsteinian explains what Beyond Beyond Einstein means:
http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/...40/pgs/4_5.pdf
Translation from French: "Therefore there is no theoretical reason why
the speed of light should not depend on the speed of the source and
the speed of the terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly,
there is no reason, in the framework of the logic of Newton's
Principia, why light should behave, as far as its trajectory is
concerned, differently from a material particle. Neither is there any
reason why light should not be sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why
don't we apply the whole Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is
what many astronomers, opticians, philosophers of nature did by the
end of 18th century. The results are surprising....and new nowadays."


I agree. That's the only correct way to go.
Relativity Theory is wrong.
Even NASA does NOT use any of Relativity Theory,
they use good old Newton.