"Mike Collins" wrote in message
...

"Lord Androcles" wrote:
Dork Van de faggot wrote

As far as I can tell, that's 13 years of swapping (proper) length of an
object in motion with (coordinate) length of that object at rest.
His using t=0 denotes that an object is moving in the (x,t) system, in
each case with proper length 1, but at rest in the (ksi,tau) system
(with coordinate length gamma).
Typo:
... moving in the (x,t) system, in each case with shorter coordinate
length 1,
but at rest in the (ksi,tau) system (with longer proper length gamma).
He wouldn't have noticed anyway.
Dirk Vdm
===========================================
Lord Androcles wrote:

Notice Dork calls his idiotic blundering fumble a "typo".
Gracious Dork calls everyone else's typos "fumbles" and his own fumbles
are "typos".

"Dale Fletcher" wrote in message ...
This is untrue, he is a very handsome boy, and never makes typos.

============================================
The very handsome boy:
https://plus.google.com/106103246416498286117/posts
The photograph is a typo.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

Can't you leave these in sci.astro where they belong?
================================================== ====
Well, see, the astronomers still believe the velocity of light is
independent of the motion of the source so they have to invent crackpot
theories of dark stars eclipsing bright ones in a game of peek-a-boo, stars
puffing up and down like blowfish, expanding out as far as the orbit of
Venus and then collapsing to the diameter of Sol in five days, stars which
blow themselves to smithereens twice in three months, settle back to normal
and then blow themselves to smithereens twice in three months again 200
years later; sci.astro and sci.astro.amateur are supposed to be
SCIENCE.astro and SCIENCE.astro.amateur, not bs.astro and bs.astro.amateur.
You should ask Unca rollo to post his links to his very nice images to a
photography newsgroup where they belong.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway