View Single Post
  #17  
Old July 2nd 07, 07:33 PM posted to sci.astro.research
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 96
Default Quasar found 13 billion years away

On 28 Jun, 08:10, Chalky wrote:
On Jun 27, 1:52 pm, "
wrote:
On 26 Jun, 10:35, Chalky wrote:
....


You have thus missed my real point, which is as follows:


Closer to us than the surface of last scattering, we should 'see'
successively closer shells of successively cooler gas, which should
emit thermal radiation, according to temperature. However, if the
temperature increases with redshift, and that radiation is, by
definition, redshifted by that redshift, all successive shells should
reinforce a black body 2.7K spectrum, when measured in the here and
now.


Rephrase it slightly - after correction for
the red shift, more distant neutral hydrogen
clouds, which were essentially in equilibrium
with the apparent temperature of the CMBR to
which they were exposed, should have higher
temperatures.


In fact that has been observed.


I agree, as does Jonathan Thornberg, apparently, in his posting
earlier.


OK, so I think that answers your question above.

However, I doubt that neutral hydrogen is the only thing which obeys
the basic rules of thermodynamics.

Phillip Helbig's quoted dark matter "bricks" would, I expect, be at
thermal equilibrium too.

Interesting, this term thermal equilibrium. It means the matter
(whatever it is) is emitting and absorbing thermal radiation in equal
measure.


Yes, that relates to another of your posts too.

Each lump of matter has the CMBR from the past, arriving from all
directions.
Each lump of matter must radiate as much as it absorbs, for thermal
equilibrium to be maintained.

So, is the theta and phi mapping of the CMBR a direct map of density
fluctuations at z=1069? That seems hardly likely once the above
described mechanism for maintaining thermal equilibrium in
intergalactic space therebetween, is taken into account.


What we see is specific nebulae in front of
the microwave background but of course it takes
some care to remove such foreground features and
there is always going to be some contamination.
The question is to what degree foreground artefacts
pollute the measurement.

George