it's called, "conservation of angular momentum,"
or clockworkspiel, at relativistical velocities,
such as that in atoms.

I shrug the body electronic!

let's see what Nienstein999 says about the "paradox,"
Neinstein998; that's at least N guys,
bogged-down in quadratic equations.

two identical clocks that start together, separate, and then rejoin
can indeed display different elapsed times between those two meetings.

Yes, and this proves SR piece of **** since SR is incapable of
predicting such a case without invoking a gross misapplication of the
Lorentz transform. *shrug

thus:
deforestation (e.g.) causes much, much
more climate change (as well as CO2) than the incredibly skinny
absorptive
spectrum of CO2, compared to the swampcooler's (water).

but, why is that, given the similar shape of the molecules?... all
that
I can come-up with, later.

thus:
the primary such datum is the total difference
of insolation from equator to pole(s),
one to zero as a first approx., high noon on the equinox.;
hence, the total absurdity of the "hole" in the ozonosphere,
esp. considering that there are so mnay of them,
at any given time.

thus:
it's called that, by the Newtonians, of course. anyway,
it's amazing what you can do with that, or at any rate
with Kepler's three orbital constraints, and a lotta math,
even though the 3-body problem is not generally solved;
there was a conspicuous advance, though,
with the 4-body problem!