Now I am going to change the name of the title of this chapter to
this:
Chapt16.17 Uniformity Principle in history of science
becomes axiom set
I am doing that because in the history of physics and the hard
sciences, except mathematics, is that they never had an axiom system
to give a foundation of their science. Geology in 1700s was so swamped
with religion making incursions into geology as a science set up a
principle called the Uniformity Principle which basically says that
the processes of geology that we see around us are made by natural
forces and not some religious supernatural. Geology certainly could
not have a axiom system in the 1700s, so came up with a second best
idea-- the Uniformity Principle which dismisses the supernatural and
allows the natural.
Trouble with physics, is that it never imposed a principle for it was
not plagued by religion, at least not noticeably, but physics was
plagued after the Maxwell Equations of 1860s, was plagued by
compartments of physics dreaming up crank crackpot ideas, with nothing
to mediate and judge if those ideas were consistent with the rest of
physics.
So you have one compartment saying Pauli Exclusion Principle where you
cannot squeeze a proton into a second proton, and you had another
compartment saying you have gravity collapse into a black hole and
squeezing a proton into a second proton. Or you had a compartment
saying that you have Special Relativity due to the Maxwell Equations
and a different compartment saying that light can be Doppler
redshifted and diametrically the opposite of Special Relativity.
So in 1700s, geology could not adopt the Maxwell Equations as the
axioms over geology, since the equations were not even borne as yet,
but geologists could do the next best thing, adopt the Uniformity
Principle.
But after 1860s, there was no excuse for physicists to have a axiom
set over all of physics. A set that keeps them honest and not one
group contradicting the next group. A set that establishes how we
discover new and true physics, where we look to the Maxwell Equations,
not some old codger or hyped up new kid on the block. Instead, we keep
our eyes focused on the Maxwell Equations.
Now in the past year, I discovered the Maxwell Equations demands that
light be a double transverse wave and not a single transverse wave.
This is very important because it proves that Magnetic Monopoles must
exist, and that Space itself is composed of these magnetic monopoles.
The EM-gravity is the result of magnetic monopoles always attracting,
in that north attracts north and north attracts south, unlike electric
charge that has both attraction and repulsion.
So now, I am aware that many physicists and schools around the world
have placed Archimedes Plutonium and these posts in a global filter or
blocking of my posts. But sincerely, does anyone in science think that
blocking or filtering AP, the suppression of AP, does anyone think
that such a strategy will work?
Does anyone actually think that no student nor news reporter will ever
ask how it is that Earth can orbit around the Sun when one is going
220km/sec and the other 29km/sec? Does anyone actually think that no
person will ask a physics professor of MIT, Princeton, Harvard,
Caltech, Stanford that how can Newtonian gravity or General Relativity
allow for a gravity that has the Sun moving about 10 times faster than
Earth in Space?
Oh sure, few students in classes of physics professor is going to
jeopardize their grade in asking the question, but there are many
students who read these posts and not in a physics class who will ask
those professors.
Many will ask these other embarrassing questions:
1) Ask your physics professor, _______, ask him/her
how it is that
they believe Newtonian gravity and General Relativity
while the speed
of the Sun in Space is 220km/sec and Earth is a mere
29km/sec.
Then
ask them whether they can ever understand that the true answer to
the
problem is EM-gravity, that the Maxwell Equations provide a Solar
gravity-cell.
2) Ask your physics professor, _______, ask him/her
how it is that
they accept the Doppler redshift when even Hubble, the
discoverer
rejected it as a measure of distance, and that it violated
Special
Relativity. When the Maxwell Equations are the axioms of
physics then
the redshift is a measure of the curvature of space,
never distance.
Call it the Curvature redshift.
3) Ask your physics professor, _______, ask him/her
how it is they come to believe that a light-wave is a single
transverse wave
of a electric field E and magnetic field B, when it is that a double
transverse
wave of E- and E+ and M- and M+ preserve the speed of light regardless
of wavelength or frequency.
4) Ask your physics professor, _______, ask him/her
why they believe
in a Cooper pairing of electrons in
superconductivity, when the
Maxwell Equations deny pairing of
electrons, but do allow for the
Malus law which when replaced for
resistance in Ohm's law solves
superconductivity.
5) Ask your physics professor, _______, ask him/her
why they believe
in dark matter and dark energy
when the Rings of Saturn are partially
solid-body-rotation. When these
professors see solid-body-rotation in
galaxies far away, they invoke
dark-matter and dark-energy, yet when
they look at Saturn and its
Rings, they fail to see any solid body
rotation and are deaf dumb and
silent on the situation. The solution
is that gravity is EM-gravity
which demands solid body rotation as
commonplace throughout the
Cosmos.
6) Ask your physics professor, _______, ask him/her
why they believe
in pulsars or neutron stars when the Maxwell Equations
explain these to be nothing more than the clashing of two gravity
cells
such as the Sun and Jupiter which makes Jupiter a mini-pulsar of 45
minute
periods.
7) Ask your physics professor, _______, ask him/her
whether it is far
easier to derive the Schrodinger and Dirac Equations
from the Maxwell
Equations summed up, or whether they prefer to derive
these equations
the manner in which Feynman devoted his three volume
text: "Feynman
Lectures on Physics" 1963. You see, when a physicist
has no axioms
for his subject, he is lost in the weeds until he does
have an axiom
set for his subject. The Schrodinger and Maxwell
Equations are easily
derived by simply a summation of the magnetic
monopole Maxwell
Equations.
8) Feynman tells us the most important single idea in all of physics
is the Atomic Fact-- all things are made up of atoms,.. So the
question is, is not the Universe itself a thing? For surely the
Universe is not a nothing. Hence, if physics is a science of the
axioms of Maxwell Equations, then the Universe itself must be a big
gigantic atom. What specific atom, this textbook says it is a
Plutonium Atom Totality. So ask you physics or math professor,
______,
ask him/her
whether that logical syllogism must be true.
Test them to see if they
are really scientists, or just another
member of the herd mentality
spewing out what it is they believe
their stooge puppet masters want
them to spew.
So the science community at large can suppress AP, globally filter and
block his posts, but the truth of the matter is that, these questions
above will keep coming up and coming up over and over again.
So, if you are a physicist at MIT, Caltech, Princeton, Harvard,
Stanford, you can easily ignore AP and block him, but what happens
when your students start asking you how it is that Earth can move at
29km/sec whilst the Sun is moving at 220km/sec
and still stay together in Newtonian gravity or General Relativity?
Are you going to try to suppress and block and filter those students?
Why not just come clean as a scientist should always be clean, and
confront and answer the questions.
The moment scientists are out to block, stifle, filter someone doing
science, is the moment you ceased being a scientist. If you are scared
of science questions, you are not a scientist.
--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here :
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies