"Giovanni" wrote in message
om...
Creationists do not know this but this article gives merit to their
group.

1. In Genesis account, God created light on the first day but the sun
and the stars were created by God on the fourth day. What is this
light or its source on the first day? Simple, the light was from a
supernova. God is light and does not need to create light to be able
to see things. So, God created a physical light so that physical
things will be visible to the physical world or universe.

2. The supernova is the result of God using his power to allow
hydrogen atoms to fuse all at once in a star or group of stars in the
center of Milky Way. The hydrogen atoms fused by allowing proton to
capture the electron in each atom contrary to the common belief of
science.

3. As a result of the fusion of electron and proton, the electron and
positron annihilated producing light and other subatomic particles
such as pions, muons, neutrinos and others. Note that in those days no
neutrino ever roamed in the universe.

4. Supernova may or may not produce a pulsar or neutron star. A
neutron star resulted in a partial annihilation of a star thru rapid
fusion or supernova. The release of neutrinos during the supernova
process could be trapped in an ongoing but not yet complete fusion of
electron and proton, hence a neutron results and the neutrons grouped
to form a neutron star.

5. The supernova fed all the stars in this galaxy with neutrinos so
that the stars and our own sun will continue to shine and not explode
destroying also the planets in the system. What a genius! It took
three days for neutrinos to travel to the farthest star perhaps our
sun?

6. The sun also produced neutrino but through electron-proton fusion
as evidenced by the light we see. Some of the neutrinos created by the
sun were trapped between electron and proton to produce neutron which
is needed to produce helium and other heavier atoms. The neutrinos
that were not trapped were able to escape the sun and travelled
through the universe. This is the reason why physicists could not
account for the missing neutrinos but invented a self-transmuting
particle.

7. The cycle of a star to undergo supernova depends on the total need
of the universe in a normal condition i.e. the net background neutrino
should remain constant. If not, a star lacking in neutrino will likely
become a supernova.

This article is utterly devoid of a single true statement, therefore it
probably is likely to be
of much use to creationists.