Thread: Berkeley 30
View Single Post
  #3  
Old April 12th 17, 05:26 AM
WA0CKY WA0CKY is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default

Alignments like these 4 stars are very common and usually quite meaningless as they are just coincidental. When working in the Milky Way as this image does, there are so many stars such accidental alignments are to be expected. I find nothing to indicate these are anything but such a coincidental alignment.

Only the top star has a catalog listing other than that of the Hubble Guide Star Catalog/Tycho catalog. It is SAO 114695 at magnitude 9.1. Below it is GSC 153:2491 at magnitude 11.9. Below that is GSC 153:1480 at magnitude 10.3 and the bottom star is GSC 153:1814 at magnitude 9.8. Only GSC 153:1480 has a parallax measurement. That puts it at about 58 light-years. I find nothing in the literature connecting these stars in any way. Most studies looking for exo-planets are based on the summer sky. Only a very few have been found in the winter sky as it hasn't had the massive Kepler type study made here due to the winter Milky way being less dense than the summer Milky Way. I find nothing to indicate these stars or any other in the field have been studied for such planets.

Rick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandy Liefbowitz View Post
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:30:39 +0100,
Thank you.
I see four quite bright stars in a line just to the left (east?) of
the cluster. I'm assuming those are nearby objects?
Do they have names and histories and exoplanets?
Are they related (yes, I do know that's unlikely as two are very blue
and two orangish but they could be a co-moving group)?

Thanks for all the lovely images,
Mand.