View Single Post
  #3  
Old May 13th 06, 06:51 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.station
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation



Hyperboreea wrote:

Solar power requires massive infrastructure. You would need a cost per
Kg about 2 orders of magnitude lower than the current.
Also, IMHO, SPS will not be able to provide more than a small fraction
of energy needs. Fission is by far preferable in the foreseeable future.


Wanna see something neat?:
http://www.enviromission.com.au/project/project.htm

Pat