On Jun 23, 7:24*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:


* *Climate change is something else and I refer you to links at this
* *URL I put together.
* * *http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Glob...Resources.html

Climate change indeed ! -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_offset

I actually didn't read that until after my last response in this
thread and good to see the 21st century version of 'indulgences'
mentioned and so they should be.

Astronomers should be the first to weigh in with the arguments which
put the brakes on what is turning into a scam,not because they ruined
the normal concerns for pollution that have always existed, but that
they managed to exclude the astronomical inputs which dictate global
climate conditions.Is there any person here with a few brain cells who
realises that any attempt to consider global temperature variations
in future by any other means bar carbon dioxide will be looked on as
'bad for business' .

Push through these social policies under the umbrella of 'climate
change' (rather than pollution control that it is) and you can forget
astronomy,planetary dynamics or anything else.With no astronomical
authority in existence,the monster that is 'climate change' by
treating carbon dioxide as the global temperature dial ,nothing is
going to happen to turn this situation around even though it is,quite
surprisingly,not all that difficult.If scientists can't explain the
seasons properly then they put global climate on hold until they get
things straight - call it a triumph of science if you wish but it is
pretty much the most effective tool available .

Many here should take the words of Copernicus to heart when dealing
with the reckless conclusion based on global climate.We barely
understand most processes and the astronomical- terrestrial connection
and it is time for people to act accordingly -


". although they have extracted from them the apparent motions, with
numerical agreement, nevertheless . . . . They are just like someone
including in a picture hands, feet, head, and other limbs from
different places, well painted indeed, but not modeled from the same
body, and not in the least matching each other, so that a monster
would be produced from them rather than a man. Thus in the process of
their demonstrations, which they call their system, they are found
either to have missed out something essential, or to have brought in
something inappropriate and wholly irrelevant, which would not have
happened to them if they had followed proper principles. For if the
hypotheses which they assumed had not been fallacies, everything which
follows from them could be independently verified." De revolutionibus,
1543 Copernicus