[[Mod. note -- I apologise for the delay in processing this article,
which was originally submitted on Thursday 2018-05-24. -- jt]]
Le 20/05/2018 Ã* 22:05, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply] a
écritÂ*:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.04317.pdf
*This* paper (1805.04317) describes an object at redshift z=4.75, not
redshift z=17. (The paper does refer to "z=17", but that's a*magnitude*
(log of brightness in a certain wavelength range), not a redshift. You
can tell this because the paper says "magnitude z=17".)
Mr Thonburg is right. I have misunderstood that article.
I apologize for this error.
jacob