It seems a proton is not a blackhole and
the reason is it is not heavy enough.

Notice the qualifier "referanced _to the lower cosmos_". In 'our'
cosmos, the proton is merely a proton. But in the lower cosmos where
every atom is a complete universe within itself, the central proton is
the Primal Particle of that universe just as *our* PP is of our universe
(under the CBB model, that is).

Now it is made up of three particles called quarks,and the strong
force particle called the gluon. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0

Well, in accelerator collisions you certainly get numerous artifacts
that decay almost instantaneously in 'our' spacetime. They're
predictable and repeatable, indicating they arise from underlying
symmetries within the nucleus. But they have no independant existance
outside the nucleus. Yet they are assigned colorful names *as if* they
were real, stand-alone particles. In Wolter's view they are
'condensates' bearing the signature of symmetries below the proton's EH.
Even the 'Top Quark' would be the microcosmic equivalent of the
Singularity at the core of *our* Primal Particle.
Under Wolter's model, only four fundamental particles
have independant existance in 'our' spacetime: the proton, neutron,
neutrino and electron PLUS the short-lived muon released in cosmic-ray
collisions.

oc