* wrote:

On 9 Apr 2004 07:46:01 GMT, John Griffin
wrote:

"Laura" wrote:


"*" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 05:14:01 +0200, "Laura"
wrote:


"Robert Buchanan" wrote in
message
.71.68.
..
Bookman wrote the following on 08 Apr 2004, which I
will now reply to:


Heh.

Just wait until she moves into grays and
CIA/Halliburton territory.
That's
when she's in her prime.

Yes, and everybody knows that Elerium 115 is the key to
free energy,
anyway!
;-)


Highly refined aluminum, 100% pure, which we're not
capable of
manufacturing
without nanotechnology.


How would that amount to *free* energy?

Your question might free her energy for other crazy ideas.
"Alexia" just makes weird claims. She doesn't attempt to
back them up.

Apparently she abandoned the crackpots who claim you can
somehow get more energy by burning hydrogen than it takes
to break the resulting water molecules.

If she doesn't drop the aluminum stories, I bet she can
eventually find a crackpot whose website says that he has
developed COLD ALUMINUM FUSION, and that it produces enough
energy to "manufacture" twice as much aluminum as it uses.

Just wait until she finds out that aluminum is an element.

You're off your meds again.

Shouldn't you be scrubbing floors or baking some cookies? Yes.