It is not that there are many billions of dollars spent each year on
what are effectively competing climate models as modeling itself is
the core problem,it is that even when faced with intelligent arguments
that introduce a planetary climate spectrum there is precious little
recognition of this observational certainty.The slightest adjustment
from 'no seasons' to a more productive perspective of 'equatorial
conditions' opens up a vista where the degree of inclination is
assigned its proper role in determining how great or how little the
latitudinal swings in temperature and daylight/darkness are for any
given planet.

The prevalence of media as a means to label every meteorological event
as an indicator of 'climate change' is dismaying,our planet's climate
is fixed by the interaction between daily and orbital motions and
their respective traits,distance from the Sun while all other inputs
are secondary such as oceans, landmass, atmospheric composition and
multiple other factors.In short,climate fits within astronomy and
those who work at the intersection between planetary dynamics and
terrestrial effects rather than simulated modeling inherited from a
vicious strain of empiricism.